Instead of saying "the intro is bad," a good reviewer says "the introduction lacks context regarding [Specific Field] and needs more recent citations from 2022–2024." 4. The Final Recommendation
The assessment is designed to be a practical application of the ethical and technical standards you learn throughout the course. Providing a "cheat sheet" would defeat the purpose of the certification, which aims to ensure you can independently uphold the integrity of scientific publishing. However, if you are preparing for the final, Understanding the ACS Reviewer Lab Final Assessment
Look for consistency between the figures/tables and the text. 3. Framing Constructive Feedback The ACS emphasizes being a "critical friend." acs reviewer lab final assessment answers
By focusing on these pillars—Ethics, Reproducibility, and Professionalism—you’ll find the final assessment straightforward and rewarding.
The final assessment isn’t about memorizing facts; it’s about . You will likely be presented with scenarios involving a manuscript and asked to evaluate how a professional reviewer should respond. 1. Ethical Considerations (The Most Critical Section) Instead of saying "the intro is bad," a
Used when the science is sound but needs significant additional experiments or massive re-writing.
The assessment tests your ability to spot "red flags" in a paper's structure. However, if you are preparing for the final,
Does it accurately summarize the findings without overreaching?
The assessment is open-resource. Keep the course modules open in another tab to double-check ACS-specific terminology.
You will be asked to choose between Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject .